The Legal Theory Perspective: Doctrinal Conceptual Systems vs. Computational Ontologies

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper addresses legal classifications by exploring the connections and possible synergies between legal doctrine and computational ontologies. In recent years legal ontologies have attracted a growing interest, not only from knowledge engineers but also from legal scholars. Indeed, several controversial issues arise concerning the elicitation and structuring of domain (legal) knowledge, and legal theory can provide useful insights in this respect. The existing tradition of definition and classification of legal concepts by legal doctrine can be regardes as an intellectual capital for the extraction and characterisation of concepts to be included in legal ontologies. The question arises as to what extent doctrinal structures can be reused in the construction of legal ontologies, and as to what extent doctrinal analyses can draw inspiration from computational ontologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández-Barrera, M., & Sartor, G. (2011). The Legal Theory Perspective: Doctrinal Conceptual Systems vs. Computational Ontologies. In Law, Governance and Technology Series (Vol. 1, pp. 15–47). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free