Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations

13Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Results: Between 2006 and 2010, the mean annual patient drug cost under Medicare Part D in the median state rose 19% for tamoxifen, 113% for anastrozole, 89% for exemestane, and 129% for letrozole, resulting in median annual out of pocket costs in 2010 of $701, $3050, $2804, and $3664 respectively. However, the 2011 availability of generic AI preparations led to median annual costs in 2011 of $804, $872, $1837, and $2217 respectively. Not included in the reported patient costs, the mean monthly drug premiums in the median state increased 58% in 2011 compared to 2007. Conclusions: The more effective AI agents became considerably more expensive during the first several years of the Medicare Part D program. Cost decreased with the introduction of generic agents, an intervention that was independent of the Part D program. It is unlikely that the Part D program ameliorated existing socioeconomic disparities in survival among breast cancer patients, but the availability of generic agents may do so. Purpose: The high expense of newer, more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy agents (aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for postmenopausal breast cancer contributes to socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer outcomes. This study compares endocrine therapy costs for breast cancer patients during the first five years of Medicare Part D implementation, and when generic alternatives became available. Methods: The out of pocket patient costs for AIs and tamoxifen under Medicare Part D drug plans were determined for 2006–2011 from the CMS Website for the 50 US states and District of Columbia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nattinger, A. B., Pezzin, L. E., McGinley, E. L., Charlson, J. A., Yen, T. W. F., & Neuner, J. M. (2015). Patient costs of breast cancer endocrine therapy agents under Medicare Part D vs with generic formulations. SpringerPlus, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0827-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free