Utilities of the post-anesthesia state derived by the standard gamble method in surgical patients

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There are no published utilities for the post-anesthesia state obtained by the standard gamble method (SG). Methods: We obtained utilities for postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and myalgia from 100 adults prior to elective surgery using SG. Results: 20% of volunteer participants could not demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of the SG process. Median utilities for each adverse effect were all very close to 1.0, and no statistically significant differences were found between them. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the avoidance of anesthesia related side effects and pain is not viewed by patients prior to surgery as being worthy of the taking of even a miniscule risk of death. This may affect the decision to utilize anesthesia techniques that trade a lower incidence of common side effects for a very low but finite risk of a catastrophic complication. © 2006 Rashiq et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rashiq, S., Edlund, D., & Dick, B. D. (2006). Utilities of the post-anesthesia state derived by the standard gamble method in surgical patients. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-8

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

50%

Psychology 3

30%

Philosophy 1

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0