Predicting 6-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common severity scores

  • Skrifvars M
  • Raj R
  • Bendel S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), SAPS II (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II) and SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores compared to simpler models based on age and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in predicting long-term outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated in the intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: A national ICU database was screened for eligible TBI patients (age over 15 years, GCS 3-13) admitted in 2003-2012. Logistic regression was used for customization of APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA score-based models for six-month mortality prediction. These models were compared to an adjusted SOFA-based model (including age) and a reference model (age and GCS). Internal validation was performed by a randomized split-sample technique. Prognostic performance was determined by assessing discrimination, calibration and precision.Results: In total, 1,625 patients were included. The overall six-month mortality was 33%. The APACHE II and SAPS II-based models showed good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75 to 0.82; and 0.80, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.83, respectively), calibration (P > 0.05) and precision (Brier score 0.166 to 0.167). The SOFA-based model showed poor discrimination (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.72) and precision (Brier score 0.201) but good calibration (P > 0.05). The AUC of the SOFA-based model was significantly improved after the insertion of age and GCS ({increment}AUC +0.11, P < 0.001). The performance of the reference model was comparable to the APACHE II and SAPS II in terms of discrimination (AUC 0.77; compared to APACHE II, DELTAAUC -0.02, P = 0.425; compared to SAPS II, DELTAAUC -0.03, P = 0.218), calibration (P > 0.05) and precision (Brier score 0.181).Conclusions: A simple prognostic model, based only on age and GCS, displayed a fairly good prognostic performance in predicting six-month mortality of ICU-treated patients with TBI. The use of the more complex scoring systems APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA added little to the prognostic performance. © 2014 Raj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skrifvars, M., Raj, R., Bendel, S., Selander, T., Kivisaari, R., Siironen, J., & Reinikainen, M. (2014). Predicting 6-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common severity scores. Critical Care, 18(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13669

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free