Quantifying optimal accuracy of local primary sequence bioinformatics methods

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Motivation: Traditional bioinformatics methods scan primary sequences for local patterns. It is important to assess how accurate local primary sequence methods can be. Results: We study the problem of donor pre-mRNA splice site recognition, where the sequence overlaps between real and decoy datasets can be quantified, exposing the intrinsic limitations of the performance of local primary sequence methods. We assess the accuracy of primary sequence methods generally by studying how they scale with dataset size and demonstrate that our new primary sequence ranking methods have superior performance. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme

4264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA

3346Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure

3326Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Inference of splicing regulatory activities by sequence neighborhood analysis

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Four mRNA Bases Have Quite Different (Un)folding Free Energies, Applications to RNA Splicing and Translation Initiation with BindOligoNet

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aalberts, D. P., Daub, E. G., & Dill, J. W. (2005). Quantifying optimal accuracy of local primary sequence bioinformatics methods. Bioinformatics, 21(16), 3347–3351. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti521

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

63%

Computer Science 1

13%

Sports and Recreations 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free