Life-saving combined heart–kidney transplantation in a previous sequential heart and kidney transplant recipient

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Solid organ re-transplantation in the context of allograft failure is a challenging clinical and ethical problem. Ideally, solid organ re-transplantation after initial allograft failure should be performed in all recipients, but this is often not clinically or logistically feasible. Methods: This report details what we believe is the first combined heart–kidney transplant in a recipient of a previous sequential heart and kidney transplant. Results: Eight years after a combined heart and kidney transplant after initially receiving a sequential heart and kidney transplant, a 31-year-old man is doing extremely well, with no rejection episodes or significant complications after transplantation. Summary: This case confirms that combined heart and kidney transplantation is a viable option for tackling the complex issue of graft failure in recipients of previous cardiac and renal grafts.

References Powered by Scopus

Drug therapy in the heart transplant recipient part I: Cardiac rejection and immunosuppressive drugs

148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant in the US: A retrospective analysis using OPTN/UNOS data

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The outcome of heart transplant recipients following the development of end-stage renal disease: Analysis of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR)

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharma, M., Anthony, C., Hayward, C., Jabbour, A., Keogh, A. M., Macdonald, P., & Sevastos, J. (2018). Life-saving combined heart–kidney transplantation in a previous sequential heart and kidney transplant recipient. European Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.12890/2018_000924

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

67%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Neuroscience 1

11%

Psychology 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0