Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model

1.4kCitations
Citations of this article
743Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The operation of attention in the visual field has often been compared to a spotlight. We propose that a more apt analogy is that of a zoom or variable-power lens. Two experiments focused upon the following questions: (1) Can the spatial extent of the attentional focus be made to vary in response to precues? (2) As the area of the attentional focus increases, is there a decrease in processing efficiency for stimuli within the focus? (3) Is the boundary of the focus sharply demarked from the residual field, or does it show a gradual dropoff in processing resources? Subjects were required to search eight-letter circular displays for one of two target letters and reaction times were recorded. One to four adjacent display positions were precued by underlines at various stimulus onset asynchronies before display presentation. A response competition paradigm was used, in which the "other target" was used as a noise letter in noncued as well as cued locations. The results were in good agreement with the zoom lens model. © 1986 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Visual attention: The past 25 years

1709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity

1421Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics

1124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(4), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211502

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 324

64%

Researcher 98

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 66

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 371

73%

Neuroscience 58

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41

8%

Computer Science 36

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 2
References: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0