Organizational synthesis in transboundary crises: Three principles for managing centralization and coordination in the corona virus crisis response

17Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Boin (2019) argues that in transboundary crisis management it is almost impossible to achieve centralization and coordination. This article identifies three principles through which actors in a transboundary crisis can balance centralization with autonomy while shaping coordination along the way. We reanalysed three transboundary cases: the Dutch military mission in Afghanistan, the downing of MH17 and hurricane Irma striking Sint-Maarten. The principles we found are as follows: (a) reformulating key strategic priorities, (b) flexible adaptation of crisis management protocols and (c) the emergence of multifunctional units. With these three principles, we reflect on challenges in the Dutch crisis response to the corona outbreak and propose improvements for progressing current crisis management efforts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moorkamp, M., Torenvlied, R., & Kramer, E. H. (2020). Organizational synthesis in transboundary crises: Three principles for managing centralization and coordination in the corona virus crisis response. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 28(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free