Disentangling parasitic vines in the tropics: Taxonomic notes for an accurate identification of Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae) and Cassytha (Lauraceae)

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Parasitic plants are often associated with agricultural, forestry and grassland economic losses, but they are also keystone species in their natural ecosystems. Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae) and Cassytha (Lauraceae) are parasitic plants which have evolved similar stem habit and morphology, rendering them remarkably similar during the vegetative stage. Since both genera are common in the tropics, misidentifications are frequent, which is detrimental for understanding their geographical distribution, biology and ecology, as well as to the development of adequate control or conservation practices. We here present a practical identification guide for a clear and accurate distinction between Cuscuta and Cassytha, using stems and reproductive structures of both fresh plants and herbarium specimens, aimed at taxonomists and agricultural experts. An identification key, a comparative table, detailed descriptions and illustrations are included to facilitate genus recognition. The current practice of macroscopic observation of the filiform stems, on which many professionals rely, may not be enough to distinguish the two genera. The analysis of stem micromorphology, and/or of the flower or fruit morphology, are necessary for a conclusive identification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Silva, S. S., Simão-Bianchini, R., Simões, A. R. G., & Costea, M. (2021). Disentangling parasitic vines in the tropics: Taxonomic notes for an accurate identification of Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae) and Cassytha (Lauraceae). Rodriguesia, 72. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202172131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free