Pilot experimentation of the accuracy of accelerometer activity count-derived breaks in sedentary time

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to conduct a pilot experimentation of the accuracy of the ActiGraph GT9X model in detecting breaks from sedentary behavior. Methods: Participants completed six transitional-based sedentary break activities while wearing an ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer. Data were processed using both the default filter and low-frequency extension filter. Direct observation was used as the criterion to observe a break in sedentary behavior. Trial 1 included the transition from sitting to standing; trial 2, sitting to walking for 30 s; trial 3, sitting to walking for 1 min; trial 4, standing to walking for 30 s; trial 5, standing to walking for 1 min; and trial 6, standing to sitting. Results: For both the default and low-frequency filter, the accelerometer only detected a break 10% of the time for trial 1. Accuracy was also low (< 40%) for trial 6. However, accuracy was perfect (100%) for trials 2-5. Conclusion: The ActiGraph GT9X accelerometer was inaccurate in detecting a sedentary break when transitioning from a sitting to standing position but was accurate for other transitional shifts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loprinzi, P. D., & Edwards, M. K. (2018). Pilot experimentation of the accuracy of accelerometer activity count-derived breaks in sedentary time. Journal of Health Sciences, 8(1), 62–67. https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2018.514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free