Serum vitamin D levels and Sjogren’s syndrome: bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Based on the results of existing observational studies, it can be found that the association between serum vitamin D levels and the risk of Sjogren’s syndrome (SS) in humans is still controversial. Based on this situation, this study aimed to assess the causal relationship between serum vitamin D levels and SS by using the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: In this study, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics on serum vitamin D levels [sample size = 417,580 (UK Biobank)] and SS [sample size = 416,757 (cases = 2495, controls = 414,262) (FinnGen)] were used. The bi-directional MR analysis was then used to assess possible causal relationships. The major analysis method of MR was performed using inverse-variance weighted (IVW), supplemented by MR-Egger and the weighted median approaches. In addition, sensitivity analyses were used to ensure the stability of the results, including Cochran’s Q test, MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger intercept test, and the leave-one-out test. Results: The MR suggested that no significant causal effects of serum 25(OH)D levels on SS risks were observed [odds ratio (OR) = 0.9824; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7130 to 1.3538; P = 0.9137]. Similarly, no evidence supported the causal effects of SS on serum vitamin D levels (β: 0.0076, 95% CI: − 0.0031 to 0.0183; P = 0.1640). Conclusion: This study found no obvious evidence that serum vitamin D level is causally associated with SS risks or vice versa. We call for larger sample size studies to further unravel the potential causal relationship and the exact mechanism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, M., Wei, F., Li, H., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Liu, Y., … Wei, P. (2023). Serum vitamin D levels and Sjogren’s syndrome: bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis. Arthritis Research and Therapy, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-023-03062-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free