Readers vs. writers vs. texts: Coping with different perspectives of text understanding in emotion annotation

46Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We here examine how different perspectives of understanding written discourse, like the reader's, the writer's or the text's point of view, affect the quality of emotion annotations. We conducted a series of annotation experiments on two corpora, a popular movie review corpus and a genreand domain-balanced corpus of standard English. We found statistical evidence that the writer's perspective yields superior annotation quality overall. However, the quality one perspective yields compared to the other(s) seems to depend on the domain the utterance originates from. Our data further suggest that the popular movie review data set suffers from an atypical bimodal distribution which may decrease model performance when used as a training resource.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buechel, S., & Hahn, U. (2017). Readers vs. writers vs. texts: Coping with different perspectives of text understanding in emotion annotation. In LAW 2017 - 11th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 1–12). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-0801

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free