Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates

  • Stevens D
  • Gaudi B
  • Stassun K
15Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We derive analytic estimates for the ability with which one can obtain precise, empirical stellar masses and radii via single-lined eclipsing binaries (EBs) in the era of Gaia and TESS . Including stars that host transiting substellar companions, such single-lined EBs already number in the hundreds from ground-based transit surveys and will comprise a major component of the science yield from the upcoming TESS mission. We explore the requirements for obtaining a given fractional precision on the masses and radii of single-lined EBs using primarily empirical means: radial velocity and eclipse measurements along with estimates of the primary’s (1) surface gravity from high-resolution spectroscopy; (2) radius inferred from parallax, effective temperature, and bolometric flux; or (3) surface gravity and density from asteroseismology. We then compare these requirements to the precision obtained from invoking stellar models or empirical relations. We show that, for a fiducial transiting hot Jupiter system, precise, accurate, and essentially model-independent mass and radius measurements for such single-lined EBs will be possible in the era of Gaia . These will be comparable in precision to those obtained with double-lined EBs. Moreover, the systems for which these methods can be applied will vastly outnumber double-lined EBs, thereby possessing the potential to sample a more complete range of stellar types (such as M dwarfs); these systems will also, in many cases, be more amenable to precision metallicity and abundance determinations than are double-lined EBs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, D. J., Gaudi, B. S., & Stassun, K. G. (2018). Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates. The Astrophysical Journal, 862(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaccf5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free