Policy Learning With Observational Data

  • Athey S
  • Wager S
167Citations
Citations of this article
292Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In many areas, practitioners seek to use observational data to learn a treatment assignment policy that satisfies application‐specific constraints, such as budget, fairness, simplicity, or other functional form constraints. For example, policies may be restricted to take the form of decision trees based on a limited set of easily observable individual characteristics. We propose a new approach to this problem motivated by the theory of semiparametrically efficient estimation. Our method can be used to optimize either binary treatments or infinitesimal nudges to continuous treatments, and can leverage observational data where causal effects are identified using a variety of strategies, including selection on observables and instrumental variables. Given a doubly robust estimator of the causal effect of assigning everyone to treatment, we develop an algorithm for choosing whom to treat, and establish strong guarantees for the asymptotic utilitarian regret of the resulting policy.

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

94888Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Support-Vector Networks

45798Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classification and regression trees

8028Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Policy Learning With Observational Data

167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Double machine learning-based programme evaluation under unconfoundedness

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with right-censored data via causal survival forests

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Athey, S., & Wager, S. (2021). Policy Learning With Observational Data. Econometrica, 89(1), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta15732

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 117

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

14%

Researcher 23

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 83

61%

Mathematics 21

15%

Computer Science 18

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 15

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free