Comparison of Adam Optimization and RMSprop in Minangkabau-Indonesian Bidirectional Translation with Neural Machine Translation

0Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Language is a tool humans use to establish communication. Still, the language used is one language and between regions or nations with their languages. Indonesia is a country that has a diversity of second languages and is the fourth most populous country in the world. It is recorded that Indonesia has nearly 800 regional languages, but research activities in natural language processing are still lacking. Minangkabau is an endangered language spoken by the Minangkabau people in Indonesia's West Sumatra province. According to UNESCO, the Minangkabau language is listed as a language that is "definitely endangered," with only around 5 million speakers worldwide. This study uses neural machine translation (NMT) to create a formula based on this information. Neural machine translation, in contrast to conventional statistical machine translation, intends to build a single neural network that can be built up to achieve the best performance. Because it can simultaneously hold memory for a long time, comprehend complicated relationships in data, and provide information that is very important in determining the outcome of translation, LSTM is one of the most powerful machine-learning techniques for translating languages. The BLUE score is utilized in the NMT evaluation. The test results use 520 Minangkabau sentences, conducting tests based on the number of epochs ranging from 100-1000, resulting in optimization using Adam being better than optimization RMSprop. This is evidenced by the results of the best BLUE-1 score of 0.997816 using 1000 epochs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahda, F. A., Wibawa, A. P., Prasetya, D. D., & Sulistyo, D. A. (2024). Comparison of Adam Optimization and RMSprop in Minangkabau-Indonesian Bidirectional Translation with Neural Machine Translation. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 8(1), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.62527/joiv.8.1.1818

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free