Performance and consistency of indicator groups in two biodiversity hotspots

17Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In a world limited by data availability and limited funds for conservation, scientists and practitioners must use indicator groups to define spatial conservation priorities. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of indicator groups, but still little is known about the consistency in performance of these groups in different regions, which would allow their a priori selection. Methodology/Principal Findings: We systematically examined the effectiveness and the consistency of nine indicator groups in representing mammal species in two top-ranked Biodiversity Hotspots (BH): the Brazilian Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest. To test for group effectiveness we first found the best sets of sites able to maximize the representation of each indicator group in the BH and then calculated the average representation of different target species by the indicator groups in the BH. We considered consistent indicator groups whose representation of target species was not statistically different between BH. We called effective those groups that outperformed the target-species representation achieved by random sets of species. Effective indicator groups required the selection of less than 2% of the BH area for representing target species. Restricted-range species were the most effective indicators for the representation of all mammal diversity as well as target species. It was also the only group with high consistency. Conclusions/Significance: We show that several indicator groups could be applied as shortcuts for representing mammal species in the Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest to develop conservation plans, however, only restricted-range species consistently held as the most effective indicator group for such a task. This group is of particular importance in conservation planning as it captures high diversity of endemic and endangered species. © 2011 Trindade-Filho, Loyola.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimization by simulated annealing

34749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

23317Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human domination of Earth's ecosystems

7257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defaunation and fragmentation erode small mammal diversity dimensions in tropical forests

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global agricultural expansion and carnivore conservation biogeography

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trindade-Filho, J., & Loyola, R. D. (2011). Performance and consistency of indicator groups in two biodiversity hotspots. PLoS ONE, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019746

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

54%

Researcher 30

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69

63%

Environmental Science 33

30%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 6

6%

Arts and Humanities 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free