Comparison of original and re-coated cutting tools machining steel

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate runchaptiComparison of Re-Coated Cutting Toolsthe performance of original and re-ground twist drills and considers the variation in the form of re-grinding that is applied to a drill after it reaches its wear limit. The following variables were considered: coating material (uncoated, TiAlN and AlCrN) and re-coating routine after re-grinding (no re-coating, re-coating over previous coating and after removal of the previous coating). The parameters evaluators of performance were: tool wear, thrust force and torque. The results showed that, in general, that re-ground drills performed worse than the original drills. Among the coated drills only drills with TiAlN, which were stripped (removal of the previous coating) + re-ground + re-coated (insertion of a new TiAlN coating) obtained values closest to the original drills. The results also showed that even boring a smaller amount of holes, drills without coating showed higher wear than the coated drills. These drills produced in most tests, higher thrust forces and higher torque values.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jackson, M. J., de Sousa, J. A. G., Sousa, M. do N., & Machado, Á. R. (2015). Comparison of original and re-coated cutting tools machining steel. In Machining with Nanomaterials: Second Edition (pp. 299–321). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19009-9_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free