Integrating expert judgment into systematic ecoregional conservation planning

Abstract

This chapter offers insights on integrating expert judgment into ecoregional conservation planning. We describe three examples that focus on benefits and challenges of (1) delivering GIS-based expert systems in stakeholder-based contexts, (2) integrating expert judgment and computer-based site selection scenarios, and (3) reaching expert consensus on delineating conservation planning areas across a diverse ecoregion. The examples highlight several important lessons. First, engagement of experts should not be simply about gaining approval. To maximize the extent of buy-in by experts, they need to be legitimately involved in the creation of methodology and results. Second, experts need to be distinguished in the planning process from stakeholders and local residents. While precise definitions are elusive and likely to vary from one region to another, a transparent methodology for assessing and weighting each group's input is important. Finally, the methods used for engaging expert participation need to match the experts' technological capabilities and conceptual understandings. While a lack of familiarity with certain aspects should not disqualify an expert from participation, it does highlight the importance of advanced preparation on the part of those facilitating the process. Beyond these more technical issues are those related to the social sciences of expert engagement. Social and qualitative forms of data are needed to build this understanding. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.