Pink-Collar Representation and Budgetary Outcomes in US States

35Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Legislatures worldwide are dominated by wealthy elites, who are often out of touch with the needs and problems of citizens. Research shows that the underrepresentation of the working class matters in terms of policy processes and outcomes. Yet the research on class has largely focused on blue-collar representatives, who are primarily men. Working-class women are more likely to hold pink-collar jobs, or low-status occupations dominated by women. We argue that pink-collar legislators are uniquely positioned to legislate over education and social service policy. To test our argument, we combine a new coding of working-class backgrounds that accounts for pink-collar representation with state spending data on education and social services from US states over time. Modeling compositional budget data, we find that class and gender intersect to shape policy outcomes via state budget allocations, with women's pink-collar representation associated with increased spending on both education and social services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barnes, T. D., Beall, V. D., & Holman, M. R. (2021). Pink-Collar Representation and Budgetary Outcomes in US States. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free