Is learning RFSAs better than learning DFAs?

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Inference of RFSAs has been recently presented [1] as an alternative to inference of DFAs if the target language has been obtained by a random generation of NFAs. We propose in this paper the algorithm RPNI2, which is a variation of the previous RPNI, that also outputs DFAs as hypothesis. The experiments done using the same data as in [1] show that RPNI2 has an error rate very similar to the rate obtained in the inference of RFSAs, but the size of the hypothesis is substantially smaller. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

García, P., Ruiz, J., Cano, A., & Alvarez, G. (2006). Is learning RFSAs better than learning DFAs? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3845 LNCS, pp. 343–344). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11605157_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free