Comparison of DNA enzyme immunoassay and line probe assays (Inno-LiPA HCV I and II) for hepatitis C virus genotyping

30Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two methods for genotyping hepatitis C virus (DNA enzyme immunoassay [DEIA] and line probe assay [Inno-LiPA HCV I and II]) were compared on 120 samples and of these 87% were assigned to the same subtype by both assays. There were 15 subtyping discrepancies which involved 5% of type 1 isolates and 90% of type 2 isolates. Amplified products from the core and 5' untranslated regions (UTR) were sequenced to resolve conflicts. Type 1 discordant samples had a guanosine at position -99 in the 5' UTR, a characteristic of genotype 1b, and a core region typical of subtype 1a. The eight isolates classified as 2a/2c by LiPA and as subtype 2c by DEIA belonged to type 2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Le Pogam, S., Dubois, F., Christen, R., Raby, C., Cavicchini, A., & Goudeau, A. (1998). Comparison of DNA enzyme immunoassay and line probe assays (Inno-LiPA HCV I and II) for hepatitis C virus genotyping. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36(5), 1461–1463. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.36.5.1461-1463.1998

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free