Foreign Policy Preferences and Vote Choice Under Semi-Presidentialism

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Under semi-presidential regimes, directly elected presidents often play a central role in foreign policy, but their responsibility for the economy is limited. I propose an office-centred explanation of voter behaviour in semi-presidential elections based on the foreign policy preferences of the electorate. In order to explore the empirical applicability of this addition to the theory, I explore the Lithuanian case: a semi-presidential country where the president has substantial powers in foreign and defence policy and the presidents are usually non-partisan. I employ a dataset from the Lithuanian 2019 post-election survey that offers a battery of items measuring the positions of voters on foreign policy issues. When controlling for alternative explanations, I find that foreign policy preferences (measured as an index of voter attitudes towards Russia and defence) are a strong and stable determinant of vote choice, in both the first and second rounds of presidential elections.

References Powered by Scopus

Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations

1782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NINE SECOND‐ORDER NATIONAL ELECTIONS – A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN ELECTION RESULTS

1703Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic determinants of electoral outcomes

975Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trust in president–a different case? Individual-level patterns of trust in political executives in Central and Eastern Europe

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jastramskis, M. (2023). Foreign Policy Preferences and Vote Choice Under Semi-Presidentialism. Political Research Quarterly, 76(2), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221119201

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 1

50%

Environmental Science 1

50%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0