P1613Efficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • Jimenez D
  • Martin-Saborido C
  • Muriel A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of the recanalization procedures for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). Method(s): We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from inception through July 31, 2015, and included randomized clinical trials that compared the effect of a recanalization procedure vs. each other or anticoagulant therapy in patients diagnosed with PE. We used network meta-analysis and multivariate random-effects meta-regression to estimate pooled differences between each intervention, and meta-regression to assess the association between trial characteristics and the reported effects of recanalization procedures vs. anticoagulation. Result(s): For all-cause mortality, there were no significant differences in events rates between any of the recanalization procedures and anticoagulant treatment (full-dose thrombolysis: odds ratio, 0.60; low-dose thrombolysis: 0.47; and catheter-associated thrombolysis: 0.31). Full-dose thrombolysis increased the risk of major bleeding (2.00) compared with anticoagulation. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of dying (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 0.67), followed by low-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.66), and full-dose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.55). Similarly, low-dose thrombolysis was associated with the lowest probability of major bleeding (SUCRA, 0.61), followed by catheter-directed thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.54), and fulldose thrombolysis (SUCRA, 0.17). The results were similar in sensitivity analyses based on restricting only to studies in hemodynamically stable PE patients. Conclusion(s): In the treatment of PE, recanalization procedures do not seem to offer a clear advantage compared with standard anticoagulation. Low-dose thrombolysis might be the best option to consider when a recanalization procedure is indicated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jimenez, D., Martin-Saborido, C., Muriel, A., Zamora, J., Morillo, R., Barrios, D., … Yusen, R. D. (2017). P1613Efficacy and safety outcomes of recanalization procedures in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. European Heart Journal, 38(suppl_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.p1613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free