The number of procedures required to eliminate positioning nystagmus in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

23Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the number of weekly canalith repositioning procedures needed to eliminate positioning nystagmus in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and to verify influences of canalithiasis or cupulolithiasis and/or semicircular canal involvement. Study design: clinical prospective with transversal cohort. Material and Method: Sixty patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo were consecutively selected according to each combination of canalithiasis or cupulolithiasis with semicircular canal involvement. Patients were treated by means of canalith repositioning procedures repeated weekly until the elimination of the positioning nystagmus. Analysis of Variance was used to verify differences between the variables. Results: An average of 2.13 procedures (from 1 to 8) was needed to eliminate the positioning nystagmus. Canalithiasis required an average of 1.53 procedures, while cupulolithiasis needed 2.92 procedures (p=0.0002). An average of two procedures was needed to eliminate the positioning nystagmus in cases with posterior canal involvement, 2.39 procedures in cases with anterior canal involvement and 2.07 procedures in cases with lateral canal involvement (p=0.5213). Conclusions: From one to eight weekly canalith repositioning procedures were needed, with an average of two, to eliminate positioning nystagmus in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Cupulolithiasis requires a greater number of procedures than canalithiasis to eliminate positioning nystagmus. Semicircular canal involvement didn't influence the number of therapeutic maneuvers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorigueto, R. S., Ganança, M. M., & Ganança, F. F. (2005). The number of procedures required to eliminate positioning nystagmus in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 71(6), 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-72992005000600014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free