Comparison of indicators of iron deficiency in Kenyan children

36Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the absence of a feasible, noninvasive gold standard, iron deficiency (ID) is best measured by the use of multiple indicators. However, the choice of an appropriate single iron biomarker to replace the multiple-criteria model for screening for ID at the population level continues to be debated. Objective: We compared ID defined as ≥2 of 3 abnormal ferritin (<12 μg/L), soluble transferrin receptor (TfR; >8.3 mg/L), or zinc protoporphyrin (ZP; >80 lmol/mol) concentrations (ie, multiple-criteria model) with ID defined by abnormal concentrations of any of the independent candidate iron biomarkers (ferritin alone, TfR alone, or ZP alone) and TfR/ferritin index (ID, >500). Values either were adjusted for inflammation [as measured by C-reactive protein (>5 mg/L) and α1-acid glycoprotein (>1 g/L) before applying cutoffs for ID] or were unadjusted. Design: In this community-based cluster survey, capillary blood was obtained from 680 children (aged 6-35 mo) for measurement of iron status by using ferritin, TfR, and ZP. Results: On the basis of the multiple-criteria model, the mean (±SE) prevalence of ID was 61.9 ± 2.2%, whereas the prevalences based on abnormal ferritin, TfR, or ZP concentrations or an abnormal TfR/ferritin index were 26.9 ± 1.7%, 60.9 ± 2.2%, 82.8 ± 1.6%, and 43.1 ± 2.3%, respectively, for unadjusted values. The prevalences of ID were higher for adjusted values only for low ferritin and an elevated TfR/ferritin index compared with the unadjusted values. The κ statistics for agreement between the multiple- criteria model and the other iron indicators ranged from 0.35 to 0.88; TfR had the best agreement (κ = 0.88) with the multiple-criteria model. Positive predictive values of ID based on the other iron indicators in predicting ID based on the multiple-criteria model were highest for ferritin and TfR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that TfR (AUC = 0.94) was superior to the other indicators in diagnosing ID based on the multiple-criteria model (P < 0.001). The inflammation effect did not appear to alter these observations appreciably. Conclusion: TfR better estimates the prevalence of ID in preschoolers than do ferritin, ZP, and the TfR/ferritin index on the basis of multiple indexes in a high inflammation, resource-poor setting. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT101088958. © 2012 American Society for Nutrition.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60643Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993-2005

1687Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Iron deficiency and reduced work capacity: A critical review of the research to determine a causal relationship

890Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Laboratory methodologies for indicators of iron status: Strengths, limitations, and analytical challenges

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement and interpretation of hemoglobin concentration in clinical and field settings: a narrative review

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Zinc, iron and calcium are major limiting nutrients in the complementary diets of rural Kenyan children

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grant, F. K. E., Martorell, R., Flores-Ayala, R., Cole, C. R., Ruth, L. J., Ramakrishnan, U., & Suchdev, P. S. (2012). Comparison of indicators of iron deficiency in Kenyan children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(5), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.029900

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

75%

Researcher 9

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

47%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

9%

Social Sciences 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free