Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: Habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of wild pigs

67Citations
Citations of this article
192Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. The effect that the proximity of habitats containing essential resources has on animal abundance at large spatial scales is called landscape complementation. Landscape complementation can influence interaction between large herbivores and their food resources where the proximity of habitats containing essential resources constrains their foraging or demographic efficiency. 2. We tested the effect that the proximity of a thermal refuge (riverine woodlands) had on interaction between wild pigs and their food resources (pasture). The numerical response of pigs (Sus scrofa L.) (estimated as r quarter-1) to pasture biomass was contrasted between four sites that were progressively more isolated from a major floodplain containing extensive areas of riverine woodland. To test whether proximity to riverine woodlands affected the numerical response of pigs through a constraint on foraging efficiency, we contrasted the numerical response of pigs between the four areas as pasture biomass declined. To test whether pigs exploited riverine woodlands primarily as a thermal refuge, we contrasted the numerical response of pigs between the four areas in different seasons. 3. We found that although pasture biomass was similar in the four areas, r was lower than expected for given pasture biomass on the two areas further away from riverine woodlands. We also found that while the effect that proximity to riverine woodlands had on the numerical response of pigs became more pronounced when pasture biomass was low, it was not significantly affected by season. 4. These results suggest that the need to access riverine woodlands compromises the foraging efficiency of wild pigs when the distance to this habitat is relatively high, but that the need to access this habitat may not be purely related to thermoregulation. 5. We developed a simple mechanistic model that allows the effects of landscape complementation on herbivore foraging and demographic efficiency to be estimated, and used the model to predict the effect that proximity to riverine woodlands would have on variation in pig density. The model suggests that wild pigs cannot persist in areas more then 10 km from extensive riverine woodlands, unless those areas are periodically recolonized. This suggests that at the margin of their range around inland river systems, given locations that can be occupied by wild pigs will vary temporally between being sources, pseudosinks and sinks.

References Powered by Scopus

Sources, sinks and population regulation

3892Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial scaling in ecology

3615Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics

939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scaledependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: Space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs

121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choquenot, D., & Ruscoe, W. A. (2003). Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: Habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of wild pigs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00676.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 81

55%

Researcher 49

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96

64%

Environmental Science 46

31%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

3%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free