Statistical process control: A feasibility study of the application of time-series measurement in early neurorehabilitation after acquired brain injury

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Progress in early cognitive recovery after acquired brain injury is uneven and unpredictable, and thus the evaluation of rehabilitation is complex. The use of time-series measurements is susceptible to statistical change due to process variation. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using a time-series method, statistical process control, in early cognitive rehabilitation. Method: Participants were 27 patients with acquired brain injury undergoing interdisciplinary rehabilitation of attention within 4 months post-injury. The outcome measure, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, was analysed using statistical process control. Results: Statistical process control identifies if and when change occurs in the process according to 3 patterns: rapid, steady or stationary performers. The statistical process control method was adjusted, in terms of constructing the baseline and the total number of measurement points, in order to measure a process in change. Conclusion: Statistical process control methodology is feasible for use in early cognitive rehabilitation, since it provides information about change in a process, thus enabling adjustment of the individual treatment response. Together with the results indicating discernible subgroups that respond differently to rehabilitation, statistical process control could be a valid tool in clinical decision-making. This study is a starting-point in understanding the rehabilitation process using a real-time-measurements approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Markovic, G., Schult, M. L., Bartfai, A., & Elg, M. (2017). Statistical process control: A feasibility study of the application of time-series measurement in early neurorehabilitation after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 49(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free