Changeover trial of azilsartan and olmesartan comparing effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with essential hypertension after cardiac surgery (CHAOS study)

7Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been widely used to treat hypertension and large-scale clinical studies have shown various benefits. In this study, we compared olmesartan with azilsartan, the newest ARB. Methods: The subjects were outpatients who were clinically stable after cardiac surgery. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either azilsartan or olmesartan for 1 year and were switched to the other drug for the following 1 year. The primary endpoints were the levels of plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone. Results: Home blood pressure exceeded 140/90 mmHg and additional antihypertensive medication was administered to 12 patients (20 episodes) in the azilsartan group versus 4 patients (4 episodes) in the olmesartan group, with the number being significantly higher in the azilsartan group. After 1 year of treatment, both angiotensin II and aldosterone levels were significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Left ventricular mass index was also significantly lower in the olmesartan group than the azilsartan group. Conclusion: This study showed that olmesartan reduces angiotensin II and aldosterone levels more effectively than azilsartan. Accordingly, it may be effective in patients with increased renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity after cardiac surgery or patients with severe cardiac hypertrophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sezai, A., Osaka, S., Yaoita, H., Arimoto, M., Hata, H., Shiono, M., & Sakino, H. (2016). Changeover trial of azilsartan and olmesartan comparing effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with essential hypertension after cardiac surgery (CHAOS study). Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 22(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free