Max Cresswell and Hilary Putnam seem to hold the view, often shared by classical logicians, that paraconsistent logic has not been made sense of, despite its well-developed mathematics. In this paper, I examine the nature of logic in order to understand what it means to make sense of logic. I then show that, just as one can make sense of non-normal modal logics (as Cresswell demonstrates), we can make ‘sense’ of paraconsistent logic. Finally, I turn the tables on classical logicians and ask what sense can be made of explosive reasoning. While I acknowledge a bias on this issue, it is not clear that even classical logicians can answer this question.
CITATION STYLE
Tanaka, K. (2013). Making sense of paraconsistent logic: The nature of logic, classical logic and paraconsistent logic. In Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications (pp. 15–25). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.