Appraising between-study homogeneity, small-study effects, moderators, and confounders

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Meta-analysis is the statistical synthesis of results from two or more clinical studies that address the same issue and compare two different interventions. Although the combination of results of several studies in a meta-analysis can increase power and improve precision, caution is needed in the presence of between-study heterogeneity and selection bias. These two factors can importantly impact meta-analysis conclusions and hence influence decision-making. Several methods have been developed to appraise the between-study variation and the tendency of small studies to yield larger intervention effects compared to larger studies. This chapter presents an overall review of methods presented in the meta-analysis literature along with their properties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veroniki, A. A., Huedo-Medina, T. B., & Fountoulakis, K. N. (2016). Appraising between-study homogeneity, small-study effects, moderators, and confounders. In Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with Overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies (pp. 161–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free