Measuring Executive Ideology and Its Influence

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Executives are important elites, and ideology is important to elite behavior, but measurement challenges and a focus on the presidency have kept scholars from fully exploring executive ideology. This article advocates studying US governors to learn more about executive ideology. It provides an overview of the data scholars can use to measure gubernatorial preferences, and highlights Bonica's campaign finance-based ideology scores (CFscores) as offering the greatest coverage and allowing common-scale comparisons with other actors. As a validation exercise, I find that CFscores explain within-party variation in other measures and predict the decisions that governors make when in office. Then, I run a preliminary test of the substantive importance of executive ideology. Four models explain state policy liberalism as a function of executive, legislative, and citizen ideology. Gubernatorial preferences emerge as most predictive of the three. These results encourage greater investigation into the role of executive ideology in the policy process.

References Powered by Scopus

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

11297Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Construct validity in psychological tests

7139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010

642Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Toward an Ideological Common Space: Extending Bonica’s CFscores to the Citizen Level

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warner, S. B. (2023). Measuring Executive Ideology and Its Influence. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 23(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2021.34

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Linguistics 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Philosophy 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0