Improving efficiency in cluster-randomized study design and implementation: Taking advantage of a crossover

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While individually randomized trials have long provided the gold standard of clinical evidence, the use of cluster-randomized trials in biomedical and social scientific research has expanded rapidly in recent years. In certain settings, randomizing by group or cluster can provide distinct advantages over individual randomization. However, a central challenge for cluster-randomized trials is ensuring that the study arms are balanced across important participant characteristics. One method to combat imbalance between study arms is to incorporate a crossover into the study design. In this design, every cluster is observed under each treatment condition, in a randomly assigned sequence. We provide a concrete example of how incorporating a crossover into a cluster-randomized study can improve balance between arms and increase statistical efficiency of a trial. However, a crossover design cannot always be effectively implemented. This commentary illustrates the potential benefits and discusses the challenges and disadvantages to incorporating a crossover in a cluster-randomized study design. © 2014 Reich and Milstone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reich, N. G., & Milstone, A. M. (2013). Improving efficiency in cluster-randomized study design and implementation: Taking advantage of a crossover. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S56730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free