Deterministic, strategyproof, and fair cake cutting

18Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the classic cake cutting problem from a mechanism design perspective, in particular focusing on deterministic mechanisms that are strategyproof and fair. We begin by looking at mechanisms that are non-wasteful and primarily show that for even the restricted class of piecewise constant valuations there exists no direct-revelation mechanism that is strategyproof and even approximately proportional. Subsequently, we remove the nonwasteful constraint and show another impossibility result stating that there is no strategyproof and approximately proportional direct-revelation mechanism that outputs contiguous allocations, again, for even the restricted class of piecewise constant valuations. In addition to the above results, we also present some negative results when considering an approximate notion of strategyproofness, show a connection between direct-revelation mechanisms and mechanisms in the Robertson-Webb model when agents have piecewise constant valuations, and finally also present a (minor) modification to the well-known Even-Paz algorithm that has better incentive-compatible properties for the cases when there are two or three agents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menon, V., & Larson, K. (2017). Deterministic, strategyproof, and fair cake cutting. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 0, pp. 352–358). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/50

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free