Increasing the rigorousness of measures definition through a UML/OCL model based on the briand et al.'s framework

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of a formal definition of measures upon a metamodel assures that measures capture the software artifacts they intend for, improve repeatability and could facilitate the implementation of measures extraction tools. However, it does not assure that the measure captures the measurement concept it claims (like size, coupling, etc). For that purpose many formal frameworks had been defined. The well-known property-based framework proposed by Briand et al. defines the most important measurement concepts regardless the specific software artifacts to which these concepts are applied. In this article we define a UML/OCL model from the Briand's framework and we relate it with the formal definition of measures upon metamodels. We describe a set of well-formed properties that a measure should verify when capturing a measurement concept (which are derived from the model). We exemplify our approach through a thorough formal definition of UML statechart diagrams measures and its well-formed constraints of size measures. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reynoso, L., Amaolo, M., Dolz, D., Vaucheret, C., & Álvarez, M. (2013). Increasing the rigorousness of measures definition through a UML/OCL model based on the briand et al.’s framework. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7973 LNCS, pp. 43–58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free