Uncertainty assessment of flood inundation modeling with a 1D/2D random field

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An uncertainty assessment framework based on Karhunen-Loevexpansion (KLE) and probabilistic collocation method (PCM) was introduced to deal with flood inundation modelling under uncertainty. The Manning's roughness for channel and floodplain were treated as 1D and 2D, respectively, and decomposed by KLE. The maximum flow depths were decomposed by the 2nd-order PCM. Through a flood modelling case with steady inflow hydrographs based on five designed testing scenarios, the applicability of KLE-PCM was demonstrated. The study results showed that the Manning's roughness assumed as a 1D/2D random field could efficiently alleviate the burden of random dimensionality within the analysis framework, and the introduced method could significantly reduce repetitive runs of the physical model as required in the traditional Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The study sheds some light on reducing the computational burden associated with flood modelling under uncertainty which is useful for the related damage quantification and risk management.

References Powered by Scopus

The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations

4239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Successful adaptation to climate change across scales

2136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate

1388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development of a stochastic hydrological modeling system for improving ensemble streamflow prediction

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., & Qin, X. S. (2018). Uncertainty assessment of flood inundation modeling with a 1D/2D random field. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 20(5), 1148–1162. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2017.219

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

67%

Environmental Science 1

17%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free