Outcomes of the bionic semicircular canals support the "density hypothesis" and "circular hypothesis"

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To date, there are three main hypotheses explaining why the human semicircular canals (HSCCs) cannot sense linear accelerations. To further study this issue, we designed a bionic ampulla (BA) instrumented with a symmetrical metal core polyvinylidene fluoride fiber as a bionic sensor, which imitates the structure and function of the human ampulla. The BA was confirmed to have a good sensing ability in experiments with a straight tube. Additionally, we designed a bionic semicircular canal model, a blocking model, and a square model. We compared the perception performance of these three models to test the "density hypothesis,"the "closed loop hypothesis,"and the "circular hypothesis."The outcomes of these experiments verified the "density hypothesis"and "circular hypothesis,"but did not support the "closed loop hypothesis,"shedding light on why the HSCC is sensitive to angular acceleration, but not to linear acceleration.

References Powered by Scopus

Principles of Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy and Its Applications to Neuroscience

844Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vestibular system: The many facets of a multimodal sense

690Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vestibular involvement in cognition: Visuospatial ability, attention, executive function, and memory

242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Parallel evolution of semicircular canal form and sensitivity in subterranean mammals

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, Y., Qin, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Z., Li, Q., & Bian, Y. (2022). Outcomes of the bionic semicircular canals support the “density hypothesis” and “circular hypothesis.” Review of Scientific Instruments, 93(3). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061752

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

33%

Engineering 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free