Use of cough peak flow measured by a ventilator to predict re-intubation when a spirometer is unavailable

21Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A ventilator includes the function to measure flow velocity. We aimed to compare the predictive accuracy for re-intubation diagnosed by cough peak flow (CPF) measured by a spirometer and a ventilator. METHODS: Endotracheally intubated subjects who passed a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled. Before extubation, CPF was measured by a spirometer and a ventilator, respectively. Re-intubation was recorded at 72 h after extubation. RESULTS: A total of 126 subjects were enrolled. Among them, 15 subjects (12%) experienced re-intubation. CPF was lower in re-intubated subjects than those without re-intubation (measured by a spirometer: 54 ± 30 L/min vs 86 ± 37 L/min, P

References Powered by Scopus

A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases

6361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Weaning from mechanical ventilation

1467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Prediction of extubation outcome in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of cough peak flow in the assessment of respiratory function in clinical practice- A narrative literature review

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation of cough peak flow using cough sounds

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bai, L., & Duan, J. (2017). Use of cough peak flow measured by a ventilator to predict re-intubation when a spirometer is unavailable. Respiratory Care, 62(5), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05260

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

80%

Researcher 3

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

52%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

36%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

8%

Sports and Recreations 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 98

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free