Critical thoughts about critical mass in representative bureaucracy: A theoretical exploration and empirical illustration

10Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Studies of representative bureaucracy frequently reference the need for a critical mass before an underrepresented group can influence policy outputs or outcomes, but the empirical literature is modest and presents mixed findings. This article presents a theoretical exploration to illustrate how critical mass can link individual behavior to organizational contexts. By examining both active representation and symbolic representation at both the individual and organizational level and specifying the different microprocesses of active representation, a series of testable hypotheses are presented. The logic suggests that the concept of critical mass might also be a useful contextual variable to examine other aspects of administrative behavior. Based on the theory, two empirical illustrations from China are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meier, K. J., & Xu, X. (2023). Critical thoughts about critical mass in representative bureaucracy: A theoretical exploration and empirical illustration. Governance, 36(3), 887–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12711

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free