On defining identity

12Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I argue that identity must be viewed as an indefinable, primitive notion. I first show that the popular attempts to define identity do not successfully escape the charge of circularity. I then argue that this is no accident. Any attempt to define identity is bound to be circular, since the intelligible understanding of the definition of identity must make recourse to the intelligible understanding of identity itself. © 1990, Duke University Press. All Rights Reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

On property identity

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Occasions of Identity: A Study in the Metaphysics of Persistence, Change, and Sameness

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identity and indiscernibility

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Constructing bodies and their qualities from observations

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Savellos, E. E. (1990). On defining identity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31(3), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093635509

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

45%

Philosophy 4

36%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

9%

Arts and Humanities 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free