I argue that identity must be viewed as an indefinable, primitive notion. I first show that the popular attempts to define identity do not successfully escape the charge of circularity. I then argue that this is no accident. Any attempt to define identity is bound to be circular, since the intelligible understanding of the definition of identity must make recourse to the intelligible understanding of identity itself. © 1990, Duke University Press. All Rights Reserved.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Savellos, E. E. (1990). On defining identity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31(3), 476–484. https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093635509