Contraceptive Vaccines for Wildlife: A Review

120Citations
Citations of this article
230Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Wildlife, free-ranging and captive, poses and causes serious population problems not unlike those encountered with human overpopulation. Traditional lethal control programs, however, are not always legal, wise, safe, or publicly acceptable; thus, alternative approaches are necessary. Immunocontraception of free-ranging wildlife has reached the management level, with success across a large variety of species. Thus far, the immunocontraceptive research and management applications emphasis have been centered on porcine zona pellucida and gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccines. Contraceptive success has been achieved in more than 85 different wildlife species, at the level of both the individual animal and the population. At the population management level with free-ranging species, the primary focus has been on wild horses, urban deer, bison, and African elephants. The challenges in the development and application of vaccine-based wildlife contraceptives are diverse and include differences in efficacy across species, safety of vaccines during pregnancy, the development of novel delivery systems for wild and wary free-ranging animals, and the constraints of certain non-contraceptive effects, such as effects on behavior. Beyond the constraints imposed by the public and a host of regulatory concerns, there exists a real limitation for funding of well-designed programs that apply this type of fertility control. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

134Citations
35Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirkpatrick, J. F., Lyda, R. O., & Frank, K. M. (2011, July). Contraceptive Vaccines for Wildlife: A Review. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01003.x

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 77

70%

Researcher 25

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81

59%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 26

19%

Medicine and Dentistry 16

12%

Environmental Science 15

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 6
References: 12
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0