Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: Semiautomated vs. manual morphological description

51Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of an automated method of shape measurement for improving the discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 47 breast lesions (32 malignant and 15 benign) were examined using a 1.5 Tesla system. Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn and extracted from high-resolution, fat-suppressed, post-contrast images, or were extracted with the use of a semiautomated computer algorithm. Shape parameters (i.e., complexity, convexity, circularity, and degree of elongation) were determined to assess whether they could be used to discriminate breast lesions. Results: Convexity differed significantly between the benign and malignant groups for both ROI methods. In addition, the semiautomated method demonstrated significantly different values of complexity. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the usefulness of several shape descriptors for characterizing breast lesions, and shows that the automated method of analysis improves the discrimination and standardization of data. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liney, G. P., Sreenivas, M., Gibbs, P., Garcia-Alvarez, R., & Turnbull, L. W. (2006). Breast lesion analysis of shape technique: Semiautomated vs. manual morphological description. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free