Shopping with a conscience? The epistemic case for relinquishment over conscientious consumption

13Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many people argue that we should practice conscientious consumption. Faced with goods from gravely flawed production processes, such as wood from clear-cut rainforests or electronics containing conflict minerals, they argue that we should enact personal policies to routinely shun tainted goods and select pure(r) goods. However, consumers typically should be relatively uncertain about which flaws in global supply chains are grave and the connection of purchases to those grave flaws. The threat of significant uncertainty makes conscientious consumption appear to be no better, or even worse, than an overlooked option. This overlooked option is consumption with relinquishment: disregarding each product's possible connections with upstream grave flaws and using the time, money, and energy saved in this way to address grave flaws directly.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kingston, E. (2021). Shopping with a conscience? The epistemic case for relinquishment over conscientious consumption. Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(2), 242–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free