Clinical significance of anemia as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer carcinoma with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

8Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Anemia is a frequent finding in cancer patients. Pre-treatment anemia is known to be associated with poor survival after surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little study was conducted in NSCLC with activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study conducted in seven university teaching hospitals in the Republic of Korea from January 2009 to February 2016. A total of 290 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations and treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as 1st line. Of these patients, 104 met the exclusion criteria. Pre-treatment anemia was defined according to World Health Organization criteria (Hb concentration <13 g/dL for men and <12 g/dL for women). Results: A total of 186 patients were finally included for analysis. Of these patients, 86 (46.2%) and 100 (53.8%) patients were classified into anemia and non-anemia groups, respectively. The anemia group had shorter median overall survival (OS) than the non-anemia group [24.83 (95% CI, 17.49-32.17) months vs. 42.10 (95% CI, 31.87-52.34) months, P=0.031]. In multivariate analysis, anemia (aHR, 2.573; 95% CI, 1.122-5.901; P=0.026) was only independent factors for poor OS. Conclusions: Our study suggests that pre-treatment anemia is a significant poor prognostic factor for OS of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR-TKI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, H. S., Shin, A. Y., Yeo, C. D., Park, C. K., Kim, J. S., Kim, J. W., … Kim, S. K. (2020). Clinical significance of anemia as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer carcinoma with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12(5), 1895–1902. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-19-3932

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free