Free will and psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: A parallel with informed consent

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In some criminal cases a forensic psychiatrist is asked to make an assessment of the state of mind of the defendant at the time of the legally relevant act. A considerable number of people seem to hold that the basis for this assessment is that free will is required for legal responsibility, and that mental disorders can compromise free will. In fact, because of the alleged relationship between the forensic assessment and free will, researchers in forensic psychiatry also consider the complicated metaphysical discussions on free will relevant to the assessment. At the same time, there is concern about the lack of advancement with respect to clarifying the nature of the forensic assessment. In this paper I argue that, even if free will is considered relevant, there may be no need for forensic researchers to engage into metaphysical discussions on free will in order to make significant progress. I will do so, drawing a parallel between the assessment of criminal responsibility on the one hand, and the medical practice of obtaining informed consent on the other. I argue that also with respect to informed consent, free will is considered relevant, or even crucial. This is the parallel. Yet, researchers on informed consent have not entered into metaphysical debates on free will. Meanwhile, research on informed consent has made significant progress. Based on the parallel with respect to free will, and the differences with respect to research, I conclude that researchers on forensic assessment may not have to engage into metaphysical discussions on free will in order to advance our understanding of this psychiatric practice. © 2010 The Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment

1048Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions

550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Oxford Handbook of Free Will

298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Free will and mental disorder: Exploring the relationship

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forensic neurosciences: From basic research to applications and pitfalls

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Against a singular understanding of legal capacity: Criminal responsibility and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meynen, G. (2010). Free will and psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: A parallel with informed consent. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 13(4), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9250-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

66%

Researcher 7

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 8

28%

Philosophy 7

24%

Social Sciences 7

24%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

24%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free