Effect of cosyntropin during adrenal venous sampling on subtype of primary aldosteronism: Analysis of surgical outcome

14Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: We investigated the clinical significance of ACTH stimulation during adrenal venous sampling (AVS) by surgical outcome of primary aldosteronism (PA). Design: Multicenter retrospective study by Japan PA study. Method: We allocated 314 patients with both basal and ACTH-stimulated AVS data who underwent adrenalectomy to three groups: basal lateralization index (LI) ≥2 with ACTH-stimulated LI ≥4 on the ipsilateral side (Unilateral (U) to U group, n = 245); basal LI <2 with ACTH-stimulated LI ≥4 (Bilateral (B) to U group, n = 15); and basal LI ≥2 with ACTH-stimulated LI <4 (U to B group, n = 54). We compared surgical outcomes among the groups using the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Results: Compared with U to U group, U to B group had poor clinical and biochemical outcomes and low rates of adrenal adenoma as pathological findings (P = 0.044, 0.006, and 0.048, respectively), although there were no significant differences between U to U and B to U groups. All patients in U to B group with clinical and biochemical benefits, however, had adrenal adenoma as pathological findings and could be well differentiated from those with poor surgical outcomes via basal LI (>8.3), but not ACTH-stimulated LI. These results were similar even when we defined each group based on a cut-off value of 4 for basal LI. Conclusions: Although PA patients in U to B group had worse surgical outcomes than did those in U to U group, basal LI could discriminate among patients with better surgical outcomes in U to B group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kobayashi, H., Nakamura, Y., Abe, M., Kurihara, I., Itoh, H., Ichijo, T., … Naruse, M. (2020). Effect of cosyntropin during adrenal venous sampling on subtype of primary aldosteronism: Analysis of surgical outcome. European Journal of Endocrinology, 182(3), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-19-0860

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free