Parsimonious blood use and lower transfusion triggers: What is the evidence?

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Evidence supports a parsimonious approach to blood use for managing anemia, contrasting with the long-standing practice of blood transfusion targeting arbitrary hemoglobin levels. Hemodilution studies have demonstrated that humans can tolerate anemia. The cumulative data have confirmed and validated the safety of a conservative approach to transfusion. This has translated into formal national guidelines for blood transfusion as well as patient safety and quality markers supporting blood management stewardship to minimize unnecessary use of blood products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Auron, M., Castillo, M. Y. D., & Kumar, A. (2017). Parsimonious blood use and lower transfusion triggers: What is the evidence? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. Cleveland Clinic Educational Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.84a.15134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free