Atypical uterine polyps show morphologic and molecular overlap with mullerian adenosarcoma but follow a benign clinical course

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A subset of clinically benign uterine polyps shows atypical morphologic features worrisome for, but not diagnostic of, Mullerian adenosarcoma. We report clinicopathologic data for 63 polyps from 58 women with atypical morphologic features including abnormal architecture, abnormal periglandular stroma, stromal atypia, and mitoses >2 per 10 hpf. Four (11%) of 36 women with follow-up tissue sampling had residual/recurrent atypical polyp. Twelve (27%) of 44 women underwent hysterectomy subsequent to a diagnosis of atypical polyp. No patient developed adenosarcoma over median follow-up of 150 months. Twenty-one primary atypical polyps underwent molecular profiling. Five (24%) harbored chr 12q13-15 gain or amplification, 9/20 (45%) harbored chr 6q25.1 gain, and 7/21 (33%) had no significant copy number alterations. Gains of chr 1q, chr 8p12, and chr 10q11.21-23, amplifications of chr 12q24.12-13, chr 15p24.1-26.1, and chr 18q21.33, and loss of chr 7 and chr 11q21 were each seen in a single polyp. Mean tumor mutational burden was 3.1 (range, 0.76–8.365) mutations/Mb. Pathogenic point mutations were identified in 12/20 (60%) primary atypical polyps. We propose the term “atypical uterine polyps” for these lesions, which show biologic overlap with early Mullerian adenosarcoma but lack molecular alterations characteristic of clinically aggressive adenosarcoma and appear to follow a benign clinical course. Conservative management with close clinical follow-up and repeat sampling can be considered for these lesions, when clinically appropriate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapel, D. B., Howitt, B. E., Sholl, L. M., Dal Cin, P., & Nucci, M. R. (2022). Atypical uterine polyps show morphologic and molecular overlap with mullerian adenosarcoma but follow a benign clinical course. Modern Pathology, 35(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00946-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free