Poor short-term glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes impairs the intestinal mucosal barrier: A prospective, single-center, observational study

21Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To determine the relation between daily glycemic fluturation and the intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Totally 66 patients with T2DM were enrolled, 33 healthy volunteers were also recruited according to the enrolled patients' gender and age in a ratio of 2: 1. Patients were bisected by the median of endotoxins level into low(< 12.31 μ/l, n = 33) and high(≥12.31 μ/l, n = 33) blood endotoxin groups. Clinical data and blood glucose fluctuations were compared between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the independent factors affecting the intestinal mucosal barrier. Results: Serum endotoxin [12.1 (4.2~22.0) vs 3.2 (1.3~6.0), P < 0.001] and fasting blood glucose levels [9.8 ± 3.6 vs 5.4 ± 0.7, P < 0.001] were significantly higher in patients with T2DM than the control group. The standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) within 1 day [2.9 (2.0~3.3) vs. 2.1 (1.6~2.5), P = 0.012] and the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE) [7.5 (5.4~8.9) vs. 5.9 (4.3~7.4), P = 0.034] were higher in the high endotoxin group than in the low endotoxin group. A multiple linear stepwise regression revealed a positive correlation between SDBG with endotoxin (standard partial regression coefficient = 0.255, P = 0.039). Conclusions: T2DM patients who incapable of maintaining stable blood glucose level are at a higher risk to associated with intestinal mucosal barrier injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shen, L., Ao, L., Xu, H., Shi, J., You, D., Yu, X., … Wang, F. (2019). Poor short-term glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes impairs the intestinal mucosal barrier: A prospective, single-center, observational study. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-019-0354-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free