Rendering technical, rendering sacred: The politics of hydroelectric development on british columbia’s saaghii naachii/peace river

30Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyzes debates over the Site C Dam on the Saaghii Naachii/Peace River in northeastern British Columbia (BC), Canada. After heated debate over the past several decades, construction on the CN$10 billion hydroelectric project—the largest in the prov-ince’s history—recently commenced. The article focuses on debates over the analysis and adjudication of cumulative effects, and concomitant treaty rights infringement, within the environmental review process. The shortcomings of the regulatory review process used to assess cumulative effects are analyzed in two ways: first, by a conventional academic assessment, and second, by a Dunne-Za teaching of the interrelationships between land, water, and animals in the dam-affected region. Through juxtaposing these two modes of analysis, the article engages with scholarship in political ecology and Indigenous political theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Behn, C., & Bakker, K. (2019). Rendering technical, rendering sacred: The politics of hydroelectric development on british columbia’s saaghii naachii/peace river. Global Environmental Politics, 19(3), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00518

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free