Multi texture analysis of colorectal cancer continuum using multispectral imagery

41Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose. This paper proposes to characterize the continuum of colorectal cancer (CRC) using multiple texture features extracted from multispectral optical microscopy images. Three types of pathological tissues (PT) are considered: benign hyperplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma. Materials and Methods. In the proposed approach, the region of interest containing PT is first extracted from multispectral images using active contour segmentation. This region is then encoded using texture features based on the Laplacian-of-Gaussian (LoG) filter, discrete wavelets (DW) and gray level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM). To assess the significance of textural differences between PT types, a statistical analysis based on the Kruskal-Wallis test is performed. The usefulness of texture features is then evaluated quantitatively in terms of their ability to predict PT types using various classifier models. Results. Preliminary results show significant texture differences between PT types, for all texture features (p-value < 0.01). Individually, GLCM texture features outperform LoG and DW features in terms of PT type prediction. However, a higher performance can be achieved by combining all texture features, resulting in a mean classification accuracy of 98.92%, sensitivity of 98.12%, and specificity of 99.67%. Conclusions. These results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of combining multiple texture features for characterizing the continuum of CRC and discriminating between pathological tissues in multispectral images.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Images of three different types of pathological tissues. (a) Benign Hyperplasia; (b) Intraepithelial Neoplasia; (c) Carcinoma; (d, e, and f) Histograms show pixel intensity distributions for each type.
  • Fig 2. Image analysis processing pipeline: multispectral image acquisition, contour-based segmentation of abnormal tissues, texture feature extraction and finally classification. (a) Optical microscopy system, staining, sectioning, and scanning. (b) Multispectral image acquisition via a CCD camera across a range of visual spectral bands. (c) Active contour segmentation algorithm for delineating ROIs. (d) GLCM, LoG and DW image texture feature extraction. (e) Supervised classification for automatic prediction of abnormal tissue types from new samples.
  • Fig 3. Examples of ground truth segmentation. (a) Original image. (b) Segmented image. (c) Labeled image. Labeled area in (c) corresponds to the ROI used for texture feature extraction.
  • Fig 4. Examples of active contour segmentation. Top-row images correspond to the (a) BH, (b) IN and (c) Ca types. Bottom-row images (aˊ), (bˊ), and (cˊ) show the ROI obtained on these images by the active contour segmentation method.
  • Fig 5. Image DW transform decomposition.R corresponds to rows, C corresponds to columns, l and h are the index of low and high pass filter respectively, 2ds1 and 1ds2 are the down-sample columns and rows respectively, and {×} is the convolution operator.
  • Table 1. Average performance metrics (%) for the three pathological tissue types.
  • Table 2. Mean (± standard deviation) of LoG texture features at different PT types.
  • Table 3. Mean (± standard deviation) of texture features extracted fromGLCM of the different PT types.

References Powered by Scopus

49998Citations
25371Readers
Get full text

Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection

30492Citations
18059Readers
Get full text

Textural Features for Image Classification

20009Citations
6254Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaddad, A., Desrosiers, C., Bouridane, A., Toews, M., Hassan, L., & Tanougast, C. (2016). Multi texture analysis of colorectal cancer continuum using multispectral imagery. PLoS ONE, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149893

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Researcher 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

35%

Computer Science 6

26%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

26%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0